Your fact-checks will appear here
Association of fact-checking organisations
Verification of factual statements rests on a defined pipeline: identify check-worthy claims, gather primary-source evidence, consult established fact‑checking organizations, and use transparent metho...
Major platforms have historically partnered with independent fact‑checkers: Meta ran an eight‑year third‑party program that included PolitiFact and dozens of IFCN‑certified outlets and accounted for l...
Yes — individuals and organizations routinely ask for fact checks on almost any topic, but who will respond, how they choose items to check, and the depth of verification varies by outlet and purpose....
vary along three interlocking dimensions: how they gather and present evidence, whether and how they use verdict labels or scales, and the degree to which they automate or crowdsource parts of the pro...
Independent fact-checkers are policed by a mix of peers, certifiers, platforms, academics and public watchdogs: professional networks like the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN) and regional s...
Fact-checkers use a mix of traditional reporting techniques — document and record checks, sourcing experts and primary evidence, and transparent methodology — alongside new tools like AI-assisted retr...
Multiple independent fact‑checkers — including legacy outlets like PolitiFact and digital nonprofits like FactCheck.org and Full Fact — publish ratings that can differ for the same network claims beca...
Available sources do not mention factually.co by name; the only provided result is Wikipedia’s global list of fact‑checking sites and databases, which notes that the Duke Reporters’ Lab maintains a da...
Independent fact-checkers use transparent, repeatable processes: they gather evidence, consult experts and primary sources, authenticate multimedia, and publish findings with citations and a rating or...