Your fact-checks will appear here
Amendment of the South African constitution
The reporting in the provided sources does not identify a specific formal (such as a high school diploma or college degree) required for applicants to join ICE’s 2025 training program; instead, covera...
ICE generally needs a judge‑signed (judicial) warrant to enter private residences, but narrow “exigent” or emergency circumstances can lawfully justify warrantless entry; consent from someone with aut...
ICE’s ability to ask for identification during encounters traces to its immigration enforcement authority under federal law and agency practice; ICE says officers must identify themselves and show cre...
Police and federal agents may lawfully demand identification when the encounter rises to a lawful Terry stop—that is, when officers have reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity—because ...
You are not required to answer substantive questions from an ICE agent; , and employers have limited obligations about access and documents. Practical exceptions and procedural details — like when ICE...
Courts evaluate probable cause in CSAM investigations without direct device evidence by asking whether the totality of circumstances—provider reports, IP traces, hash matches, human review, and corrob...
ICE agents generally to conduct enforcement actions unless occupants give voluntary consent or a narrow set of exceptions apply, such as lawful warrantless arrests in public spaces or exigent circumst...
The most common probable cause ICE cites to detain someone is that the person is "subject to removal"—frequently grounded in criminal convictions or immigration-related final orders—but in practice th...
A phone accessing an illegal website can be powerful evidence but is not automatically enough to convict; courts admit phone-based evidence when it’s lawfully obtained and tied to the elements of a cr...
The most politically explosive ICE enforcement actions during 2015–2016 were large residential and community “fugitive” operations — notably January 2016 roundups that took more than 120 Central Ameri...
Federal law grants ICE authority to make certain warrantless arrests in immigration matters, but that authority is constrained by judicial rulings and local policies; , yet courts and some jurisdictio...
Defense teams have repeatedly succeeded in suppressing digital CSAM evidence by attacking the legality and technical reliability of how data was seized, preserved and analyzed—most often through motio...
Since 2023, federal courts had been tightening what counts as “reasonable suspicion” for interior ICE stops by demanding particularized, articulable facts rather than broad demographic markers, but a ...
The recent Supreme Court stay lifted a lower-court injunction that had barred ICE and DHS from using factors like “apparent race or ethnicity,” language, workplace, or presence at particular locations...
Immigrants have constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures—the Fourth Amendment applies to many ICE interactions—but courts and agencies treat ICE “administrative” practices...
Federal law allows ICE to arrest people without a judicial warrant in many circumstances, but multiple recent court rulings and legal guides make clear that to enter a private home or other non‑public...
ICE applies a form of to initiate immigration stops, brief detentions, and some warrantless arrests, but courts and policy materials impose limits on what factors officers may rely on and how suspicio...
Courts over the last decade have produced a mix of rulings that both curb and scrutinize ICE authority, finding constitutional violations in practices like warrantless detentions and “knock-and-talk” ...
A series of 2025 court decisions and reporting show that , with judges requiring judicial warrants to enter private areas and enforcing consent decrees that limit warrantless arrests; the common excep...
ICE agents sometimes use deception and ruses to gain access to people or places they target, but constitutional protections, agency guidance, and recent court orders constrain what they may do without...