Your fact-checks will appear here
International scientific organization, located in Germany
Scientific reviews find that public exposure to 5G radiofrequency (RF) fields so far remains below international guideline limits and that no causal adverse health effect has been established, but a s...
Major systematic reviews and expert bodies find no conclusive evidence that 5G-frequency radiofrequency (RF) fields, at exposure levels experienced by the public, cause cancer; WHO/IARC and national a...
Scientific reviews to date find when exposure stays within international limits; most authoritative bodies conclude that exposures from public 5G installations are far below guideline thresholds . Som...
Scientific bodies report no causal link between 5G exposure and disease and say public exposure is below international limits, while a persistent minority of scientists and advocacy outlets argue plau...
Apple’s regulatory documents state the Apple Watch is tested to meet RF exposure limits required for sale in markets like the U.S. and EU; regulators measure Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) to ensure d...
Regulators (FCC/ICNIRP) require wearable transmitters like smartwatches to meet RF exposure limits, and public-health agencies say typical smartwatch emissions are low compared with those limits . If ...
Regulatory safety limits for radiofrequency (RF) emissions apply broadly and do not set separate exposure “standards” for urban versus rural cell sites; national and international guidance (e.g., ICNI...
The supplied materials present three distinct claim clusters: general descriptions of 5G capabilities and mmWave benefits, public-health concerns alleging biological effects from radiofrequency emissi...