Your fact-checks will appear here
Dietary supplement evaluation company and database
Independent, third‑party testing of dietary supplements is performed by a mix of accreditation bodies, independent reviewers and commercial analytical laboratories—NSF, USP, ConsumerLab, Informed/INFO...
Multiple independent tests and investigations have repeatedly found detectable lead in many protein-formulated products — including powders, shakes and nutrition bars — with plant-based formulas often...
A handful of consumer-focused organizations and certification bodies independently buy, test and publish dietary supplement results—most prominently ConsumerLab, Labdoor, NSF and USP—while specialist ...
When a glossy ad claims a celebrity swears by a supplement, consumers should treat the claim as a provable assertion, not an article of faith: regulators require endorsements to reflect the celebrity’...
are a mixed bag: independent testing and certification correlate with higher likelihood that a product contains what its label claims, while multiple studies and independent lab reports have found wid...
Turbo — a weight‑loss product marketed as a dietary supplement — has been the subject of direct FDA laboratory analysis, which found concealed prescription drugs in the product . Separately, “LipoFit”...
Online supplement testimonials are a common tool for persuasion but can be fabricated or misleading; consumers can’t rely on testimonials alone and should combine scrutiny of seller and product creden...
User testimonials and marketplace reviews are poor substitutes for controlled scientific evidence when judging whether a supplement actually works: they are anecdotal, subject to placebo effects and s...
Independent testing of male‑vitality supplements is widely available through specialized consumer labs, third‑party certifiers, and commercial analytical service providers; these tests focus on identi...
Garaherb’s own marketing describes the product as “made entirely from pure plant ingredients and natural minerals” and says it contains “clinically supported ingredients,” but the publicly available G...
Verifying a supplement company’s legitimacy rests on two verifiable pillars found in the reporting: independent third‑party testing/certification and transparent, traceable business practices — look f...
Consumers who want to know if a published clinical study actually supports a claim for a specific branded supplement should treat the paper as a piece of evidence to be matched — not as an automatic e...
Consumers should insist on independent laboratory evidence — not just marketing — that a cognitive supplement contains the ingredients and amounts claimed and is free from contaminants and banned subs...
Self-reported supplement reviews are routinely distorted by at least three measurable biases: social desirability and identity-driven reporting, extreme-selection/volunteer bias in online reviews, and...
Independent, ISO/GLP-accredited third‑party labs and specialist testers — not manufacturers — typically issue Certificates of Analysis (COAs) for peptide products like “gelatide”; industry players nam...
Independent testing sites like ConsumerLab/ConsumerLab.com and other review organizations routinely test joint‑health supplements for label accuracy, contaminants and basic safety; reporting cited her...