Your fact-checks will appear here
Caucus of the U.S. Congress
Multiple contemporary reports and advocacy analyses establish that contentious policy riders on appropriations bills in 2024–2025 targeted abortion, LGBTQ rights, and related civil-rights issues, and ...
When passport or immigration documents touch a political controversy, members of Congress play three visible roles: pushing legislation that would expand or curtail passport powers (e.g., bills in 202...
The evidence in the supplied analyses shows that the specific anti‑LGBTQ funding riders introduced in House appropriations measures did not survive into the final continuing resolution; key hostile am...
Two clear fault lines drove opposition to late‑2024 and early‑2025 spending legislation: These disputes centered on explicit policy riders embedded in appropriation drafts and separate “poison pill” i...
The claim "was the US government funding overseas pro-gay activities" is partly true in that multiple strands of US policy, congressional advocacy, and NGO partnerships have involved support for LGBTQ...