Your fact-checks will appear here
Genus of insects
A small set of privacy-focused general search engines—Swisscows, MetaGer, Mojeek, DuckDuckGo/Startpage and privacy metasearch tools like SearX—offer the strongest protections when used to look up adul...
Privacy experts point to a small stable of alternatives to DuckDuckGo — notably Startpage, Brave Search, MetaGer, Mojeek, Qwant and Searx — each chosen for different tradeoffs between independent inde...
Popular privacy browsers and search engines take different technical and policy approaches to reduce legal exposure for users: Tor Browser routes traffic through multiple encrypted volunteer nodes to ...
The available reporting catalogs many “” search engines—, , , , , , , and others—but the pieces supplied do not document of those engines’ core privacy claims; reviewer tests and site descriptions are...
Several privacy-focused search engines advertise use of encryption to protect queries in transit; a subset also claim additional client-side or “local” encryption so queries are encrypted before leavi...
No single browser or search engine is universally “strongest” on both legal protections and transparency; choices trade off default privacy, technical protections, and published transparency reports (...
A set of widely mentioned privacy‑focused search engines—DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, Startpage, Qwant, MetaGer, Searx (and forks), Mojeek and niche players like Gibiru—publicly claim no‑logging or zero ...
Search Encrypt is repeatedly documented in vendor and third‑party sources as performing client‑side encryption of search queries with a short‑lived key before sending them to its servers (company FAQ ...