Your fact-checks will appear here
Council of Better Business Bureaus in the United States and Canada
has a clear enforcement record against bogus “” and other ads, exemplified by its high‑profile complaint and settlement with (Lumosity) for deceptive advertising , while the agency and have signaled a...
Brave Search says it does not collect identifiers that can link queries to individuals or devices and “never profiles” users; it records ad clicks/views in an anonymized way and uses opt‑in programs (...
DuckDuckGo's public stance is that it minimizes user data collection so there is little or no search or browsing history to hand over to governments, and the company says it will efforts to compel wha...
Available sources do not report any specific FTC or FDA enforcement action against Neurocept by name; reporting instead documents broad FTC/FDA guidance and enforcement trends for health-product marke...
Federal and state law combine to give consumers and regulators multiple tools against : the enforces truth-in-advertising and can demand refunds, corrective ads, injunctive relief, and bans, while the...
Three federal agencies are central to regulating dietary supplement makers like Burn Peak: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates product safety, labeling and manufacturing under DSHEA and C...
Reporting about since 2022 centers on two related claims: that the company’s products sometimes allowed telemetry or third‑party trackers to communicate with domains, and that DuckDuckGo’s marketing o...
Regulators—primarily the —have pursued through civil enforcement actions, monetary settlements, and injunctions banning fake celebrity endorsements and related deceptive tactics . Those actions have i...
Systematic, reliable counts of how often physicians’ names are misused in dietary-supplement advertising do not exist in the public reporting reviewed, but regulators have long treated deceptive healt...
Marketers routinely translate preliminary lab work—cell, animal, or single small human studies—into consumer-facing supplement claims by leaning on vague qualifiers, selective citations, and non-autho...
Federal and state consumer-protection tools exist to punish and remedy deceptive celebrity or “doctor” endorsements for online supplements: the Federal Trade Commission enforces truth-in-advertising r...
Federal and industry actors have deployed a mix of warning letters, litigation, injunctions, refund programs, and voluntary self‑regulatory reviews to push back against deceptive dietary‑supplement we...
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) enforces truth-in-advertising for endorsements, requiring clear disclosures of material connections and substantiation for health claims, while the Food and Drug Adm...
Regulatory standards for dietary supplements create a permissive but structured environment that allows brain‑health products to be marketed with "structure/function" and other limited claims so long ...
Regulators and state attorneys general have intensified scrutiny of dietary supplements industry-wide, with the FDA and FTC stepping up warning letters and enforcement trends and state AGs increasingl...