Your fact-checks will appear here
Legislation intended to preserve historic sites in the United States
President Trump’s demolition of the White House East Wing to build a new ballroom sits in a legally gray zone: existing federal statutes and exemptions likely permit the administration to proceed, but...
The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) contains a statutory exemption—Section 107—that removes the White House from the Act’s Section 106 review requirements, meaning the White House is to unde...
Section 107 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) exempts the White House, the U.S. Capitol and the Supreme Court from the NHPA’s Section 106 review process, meaning those three sites are n...
Federal oversight of White House renovations involves multiple agencies with overlapping roles: the is the primary reviewer for federal construction in Washington, D.C.; the participates in review pro...
The central legal fact is that the White House is largely under the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), allowing an administration substantial discretion over changes to the executive residence...
The West Wing has been repeatedly renovated and expanded since its 1902 origins, with major works under Presidents Taft, Hoover, and Roosevelt that added offices, a second floor and subterranean space...
The short answer: , creating a grey area exploited in recent renovation debates. Reporting and preservation groups show a split: officials cite exemptions and internal oversight while preservationists...
The official process for approving White House renovations ordinarily involves multiple federal reviews, advisory committees, and sometimes Congressional oversight, but the White House is from parts o...
The available reporting shows , which included a 2009 basketball court and a privately funded overhaul of the private residence and Oval Office. Contemporary accounts emphasize that the Obamas paid fo...
The National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) requires federal agencies to assess effects of federally funded or permitted projects on historic properties through a Section 106 review, but Congress ex...
Available reporting shows the United States’ preservation framework—centered on the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) and Section 106 review—governs federal projects and requires consultation ...
The East Wing demolition and renovation has caused immediate for White House staff, triggering relocations of the first lady’s office, social staff, and other personnel, while raising legal and preser...
The typical legal pathway for federal projects that affect historic buildings is the Section 106 process under the National Historic Preservation Act, but that review is often not formally triggered f...
Since 1966 the White House has pursued a dual strategy of preserving its historic fabric while accommodating modernization needs through restorations, selective architectural work, and periodic renova...
The White House’s relationship with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) has been contested: the White House is often treated as , leading preservationists to argue projects have proceeded wi...
The documents supplied do not establish a single, authoritative enforcer of White House historic-preservation rules; available analyses point to the as a policy actor and to historic actors such as th...
to alter , a unique federal property, but that authority sits alongside a thicket of statutes, advisory commissions and congressional leverage — and that exempts the White House from the standard hist...
is a statutory consultation process under the that requires federal agencies to identify and consider effects on historic properties and to consult with , tribes, and other consulting parties; in , th...
Past presidential overhauls of the have mixed formal congressional control over funding with a patchwork of administrative and advisory reviews for historic preservation; routinely authorizes money fo...
is neither unlimited presidential whim nor purely congressional territory: a tangle of statutes, exemptions, advisory agencies, funding rules and case law together define what a president can do — and...