Your fact-checks will appear here
The question as phrased — "Does factually use AI as a source?" — is ambiguous and cannot be answered definitively from the supplied reporting because none of the provided sources identify an organizat...
AI is increasingly used to generate or assist fact-check results, but the landscape is mixed: some services produce automated, AI-created verdicts while established fact‑checking organisations general...
The sites in the provided reporting are run by human-founded companies that deploy machine‑learning models and software to detect AI-generated text; they are not themselves autonomous AI entities oper...
You asked “is this an AI website.” Available reporting shows a crowded market of websites offering AI-detection tools and related services — many sites advertise high accuracy, multi‑feature suites, a...
Available sources make no direct claim that factually.co is AI‑generated; the supplied search results do not mention factually.co at all, so there is no documented evidence either way in this set of d...
“Factually” is not directly described in the supplied search results; available sources do not mention a single product simply named “Factually,” so I cannot state its exact nature from these results ...
Available sources show active debate and testing about whether AI outputs are factually correct and about tools to detect or audit AI-generated content; studies and reporting document meaningful error...
Automated tools and AI models are already used to help fact-check content — they speed searches, flag likely errors, and surface repetitions across media — but experts and libraries stress these syste...
There is no single authoritative registry that labels every piece of political media as AI‑generated, but a network of reputable fact‑checking organizations and specialist databases actively track, fl...
There is no reliable description of factually.co in the provided reporting, so any firm claim about that specific domain’s ownership, business model, or technology stack cannot be established from the...
Consumers trying to tell whether an online supplement endorsement is genuine or AI‑generated must combine technical checks (AI detectors and domain reputation) with traditional source verification and...
Factually is presented publicly as a consumer-facing verification service that offers an "AI fact-checker" accessible via messaging apps like WhatsApp and Telegram, with paid plans starting around €9/...
There is no direct evidence in the provided reporting that identifies which artificial intelligence system powers factually.co; none of the supplied sources mention factually.co by name or link its ba...
There is no way, from the reporting provided, to determine with certainty whether “this page” was AI‑generated without analyzing the specific text with tools or metadata; AI detection tools exist and ...
Available sources do not mention Factually.co or state who builds its answers; none of the supplied search results refer to that site specifically, so there is no direct evidence in the provided repor...
AI systems branded as “fact checkers” are increasingly common, but independent testing and journalism show they often make substantive errors, omit context or produce confident but outdated answers — ...
Viewers can check channel verification badges, metadata standards like C2PA Content Credentials, and third‑party AI detectors — but each method has clear limits: YouTube’s grey check confirms channel ...
There is clear evidence that many “factual answers” you get from AI systems are themselves AI-generated and can be both useful and error-prone: independent studies found substantial error rates (e.g.,...
Available sources in this set do not directly say that Factually.com uses AI to generate its content; they focus broadly on AI content detection tools, fact‑checking practices, and the growing share o...
AI systems can be highly useful for fact-checking and producing accurate, consistent outputs in certain settings (for example, routine data-driven briefs and tools optimized for factuality) but they a...