Your fact-checks will appear here
Image identification technology
ISPs detect and report CSAM through a mix of voluntary technical tools (hash‑matching like PhotoDNA), network blocking and URL blocklists, and legal/reporting obligations such as U.S. reporting to NCM...
Snapchat’s parent company reports that its automated detection and reporting systems generated roughly 690,000 CyberTip submissions to the U.S. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCME...
Cyberlockers sometimes supply NCMEC and law enforcement with the metadata and logs necessary to pursue downloaders of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), but this access is uneven and contingent on th...
Federal law today requires online providers to report apparent child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) when they become aware of it, but it...
Hash-matching detects known child sexual abuse material (CSAM) by converting images or video frames into compact digital fingerprints (“hashes”) and comparing them to curated databases of verified CSA...
Investigators can establish access to CSAM without a suspect’s physical device by tracing cloud-stored matches, server logs, account metadata, and financial or network traces — for example, on-device ...
Investigators stitch together image hashes, file and network metadata, platform logs, and third‑party data to move from a detected file to a user or server of interest, using forensic pipelines and ma...
CSAM stored on file-hosting services and cyberlockers can and does remain undetected for long periods—sometimes years—because a mix of technical gaps (hash-dependent detection, delays in hash circulat...
Investigating every person who downloads CSAM from a file-hosting site linked to a teen porn site is legally mandatory in many jurisdictions and technologically possible in limited cases, but it is op...
An OpenAI-generated or platform-generated CyberTip to NCMEC does not, under the statutes and reporting practice described in public documentation, have to include a named victim, an exact physical loc...
Most internet services do not keep CSAM-related logs forever—many apply short preservation windows and rely on voluntary detection—so even when IP logs exist they often expire, are incomplete across j...
Documented outcomes for OneDrive account suspensions tied to sexual content show two realities: Microsoft offers an appeal pathway and promises review, but public reporting and user threads repeatedly...
Platforms detect and voluntarily or legally must report suspected CSAM—including AI-generated imagery—to NCMEC’s CyberTipline, typically using automated hash‑matching and moderation workflows that cre...
Timestamps on file-system artifacts and network/transfer metadata plus content hashes and geolocation tags are repeatedly cited by industry and forensic practitioners as the most persuasive, actionabl...
Digital forensic methods can create evidence consistent with unintentional possession — for example, metadata timelines, artifact context (shared accounts, browser cache, cloud sync logs), and recover...
Prosecutors and tech companies primarily rely on automated detection (hash-matching and AI classifiers), preserved provider records and digital forensics to build cases about users who viewed CSAM, in...
Honeypots capture network traffic and interactions that investigators can link to an online user using conventional network identifiers (IP addresses), device- and browser-based fingerprints, and even...
Digital investigators use a mix of device-level extraction, hash-based content matching, network/IP correlation, cloud-provider telemetry and triage/AI tools to trace material and accounts involved in...