Your fact-checks will appear here
Open source privacy tests of web browsers
In 2025 independent testing and specialist guides repeatedly identify Tor, Brave, and Firefox (and Firefox forks like LibreWolf) as the strongest mainstream options for fingerprint and tracker resista...
Brave and Firefox repeatedly appear in 2025 vendor and review roundups as leading choices for everyday privacy, with Brave praised for built‑in ad/tracker blocking and Firefox lauded as the most priva...
Brave, Tor/Mullvad-derived browsers, and Firefox (including forks like LibreWolf) are the most-cited 2025 choices for strongest tracker and fingerprinting protection; tests such as EFF’s Cover Your Tr...
In 2025, mainstream private modes differ mainly by what they block (third‑party cookies, known trackers, fingerprinting scripts) and how—list‑based blocking and isolation (Firefox ETP) versus aggressi...
Free, secure browsers most often recommended as alternatives to niche projects like IronFox include Brave, Firefox (and hardened forks), Tor Browser and privacy-focused Chromium forks; reviewers repea...
The consensus among 2025 reviews: Brave and Tor remain top picks for different privacy goals — Brave for fast, built-in tracker-blocking and private search options, Tor for strong anonymity at the cos...
You can measure your browser fingerprint before and after enabling DuckDuckGo’s protections by running established fingerprint tests (for example EFF’s Cover Your Tracks) and comparing metrics such as...
Audited, open-source browsers with regular security updates and enterprise support do exist: Mozilla Firefox (including Firefox for Enterprise/ESR) is open-source, receives regular audits/patches and ...
is an open-source project that runs an automated suite of in‑browser checks against major browsers to measure , including a set of tests; results are presented as pass/fail indicators for specific lea...
A cluster of free browsers in 2025 aim to match or exceed IronFox’s privacy-first posture by combining open-source roots, aggressive tracking protection, and hardened defaults—most notably Mozilla Fir...
Open‑source, privacy‑hardened browsers exist and are widely recommended for high‑risk or privacy‑conscious users: prominent examples include LibreWolf, Mullvad Browser, Ungoogled Chromium forks, GNU I...
The consensus across recent reviews and audits is that no single browser is perfect; choices trade convenience, fingerprint resistance, update cadence, and vendor trust. Independent audits like Privac...