Your fact-checks will appear here
AI-assisted writing tool
Short social media posts remain the toughest terrain for AI detectors: many tools explicitly underperform on texts under a few hundred words, so no single detector is infallible for captions or tweets...
The core difference is straightforward: whose is the possessive form of who and indicates ownership or association, while who’s is a contraction of who is or who has and stands in for two words . Conf...
The sites in the provided reporting are run by human-founded companies that deploy machine‑learning models and software to detect AI-generated text; they are not themselves autonomous AI entities oper...
You asked “is this an AI website.” Available reporting shows a crowded market of websites offering AI-detection tools and related services — many sites advertise high accuracy, multi‑feature suites, a...
Commercial AI‑detection tools claim they can identify AI‑generated text and even the originating model, and some vendors report very high accuracy in tests . Independent academic testing and educator ...
Consumers trying to tell whether an online supplement endorsement is genuine or AI‑generated must combine technical checks (AI detectors and domain reputation) with traditional source verification and...
There is no way, from the reporting provided, to determine with certainty whether “this page” was AI‑generated without analyzing the specific text with tools or metadata; AI detection tools exist and ...
Yes — this response is produced by an AI assistant; the sources provided do not include an external verification of this specific chat interface's identity, so that claim cannot be corroborated with t...
Viewers can check channel verification badges, metadata standards like C2PA Content Credentials, and third‑party AI detectors — but each method has clear limits: YouTube’s grey check confirms channel ...