Your fact-checks will appear here
Organization reporting scientific paper retraction
There is equivalent to that systematically catalogs retractions and corrections for major news networks; instead the public record is fragmented across specialist watchdogs, fact-checking projects and...
Available reporting and the documents provided do not identify a catalog of formal “ news retractions”; instead they document longstanding and a recent corporate rebrand — facts that complicate any si...
Available sources do not report any major medical journal retractions or expressions of concern specifically naming work by “Bosworth.” The materials supplied focus on broad trends in retractions, dat...
Available sources make no mention of a company or product named “Gravite,” nor any peer‑reviewed replication studies specifically testing a technology or method called Gravite (not found in current re...
Available sources do not show any academic papers or government/policy reports that cite Blendr News; the search hits include a Blendr News Substack page and media mentions about the outlet (e.g., a G...
There is no comprehensive public list in the provided sources cataloguing “the most widely documented Daily Mail corrections and retractions” over the last decade; Daily Mail publishes periodic "Clari...