Your fact-checks will appear here
Law blog about the U.S. Supreme Court
There is no credible reporting in the provided sources that President Donald J. Trump was arrested today; the news items instead document arrests of other figures and policy moves by the Trump adminis...
No credible reporting in the materials provided indicates that Donald Trump will be arrested today; live coverage pages track developments but do not report an imminent arrest . Historical context sho...
There is no credible reporting in the provided sources that Donald Trump will be arrested tonight; the materials document past indictments, a prior voluntary surrender and booking in 2023, and ongoing...
Reporting and institutional reviews show numerous critics, legal groups, and congressional Democrats say President Trump’s actions since January 2025 have strained or violated constitutional norms — c...
Federal law gives the president powerful tools to federalize or deploy National Guard troops, and recent 2025 actions show administrations can and have moved Guard forces without a governor’s consent ...
Available reporting shows several high‑profile legal challenges to actions by President Donald Trump that lower courts have deemed unconstitutional and several Supreme Court decisions addressing limit...
The Constitution does not give a simple yes-or-no answer: federal law allows the president to federalize and deploy National Guard units in specific circumstances (invasion, rebellion, or to execute f...
A Supreme Court decision, once issued, cannot be “appealed” to a higher judicial body because the Court is the nation’s highest tribunal, but it can be revisited through narrow legal and political pat...
Debate over Supreme Court reform in 2024–2025 centers on three recurring proposals: expand the Court’s size (“court‑packing”), impose term limits, and adopt a binding ethics code; advocacy groups and ...
Major episodes cited by critics as examples of Donald Trump “ignoring” court rulings center on aggressive enforcement choices and rapid executive actions that courts blocked or limited, most prominent...
On Dec. 16, 2025 there is no article in the provided set that records specific quotations or a single speech by Donald Trump about judges on that date; available sources instead document a string of l...
Lawmakers and legal scholars have reacted to the Supreme Court’s December 2025 activity by sharply debating presidential removal power, agency independence and the scope of the Court’s docket; support...
There is no standing Supreme Court decision that directly blesses or forbids the Trump administration’s January 2026 military operation in Venezuela; what exists instead are prior high‑court precedent...
No news organizations can be definitively identified from the supplied reporting as having obtained or published court exhibits from a case styled "USA v. Riley"; the available documents focus overwhe...
Retired members of the U.S. military who receive retirement pay remain, under current practice and case law, potentially subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) and can be recalled for ...
The set of reporting provided for this query focuses on federal travel and immigration proclamations, litigation against presidential actions, and a handful of Supreme Court dockets, but it does not i...
In 2025 a torrent of litigation targeted President Donald Trump’s second-term actions: trackers counted hundreds of suits challenging executive orders and agency moves, and the results were mixed — so...
Precedent for removing high-ranking U.S. officials runs along three main tracks: constitutional political removal (resignation or 25th Amendment), impeachment and conviction by Congress, and statutory...
Prosecutors have in multiple Trump-era matters sought to continue enforcement or to appeal adverse rulings, but the provided reporting shows more examples of the government appealing or seeking stays ...
Donald Trump and his administration have repeatedly made claims or taken legal positions that portray the presidency as having near‑unchecked authority — for example arguing that courts cannot review ...