Your fact-checks will appear here
Several browser extensions and standalone services claim to detect AI‑generated or deepfake videos on YouTube, including AI Content Shield (Chrome/Firefox), Hive AI Detector (Chrome), Hiya’s Deepfake ...
Fact-checkers debunked a wave of images purportedly tied to the ’s recent release of “” by combining technical AI-detection tools, provenance checks (reverse image search and account tracing), and vis...
Fact-checkers concluded the –/Maxwell/ images were AI-generated based on a cluster of technical signs — visible watermarks linking the images to ’s Grok model, outputs from multiple AI-detection tools...
Consumers can triangulate whether a video testimonial is synthetic by combining three approaches: automated detectors that flag visual, motion and audio anomalies; provenance and metadata checks (incl...
of public figures are produced along a spectrum from simple edits to fully synthetic, multi-modal fabrications, using pipelines like , , and ; detection combines human scrutiny with automated detector...
The evidence in the supplied reporting does not allow a definitive determination that the YouTube link is AI-generated; none of the sources reviewed inspected that specific video, they describe tools ...
Fact-checkers routinely concluded that short, viral political videos often lack crucial context or are manipulated, and disability-focused outlets emphasize careful sourcing and accessibility in cover...