Your fact-checks will appear here
Reporting from D Magazine, the Columbia Journalism Review/Tow Center and others found multiple signals tying the resurrected Dallas Express to the Metric Media “pink slime” network — including contemp...
Available sources show active debate and testing about whether AI outputs are factually correct and about tools to detect or audit AI-generated content; studies and reporting document meaningful error...
There is no direct evidence in the provided reporting that a domain named exists or that it is the same product as the sites covered in these sources; the available material documents services named “...
Available sources do not mention Factually.co or state who builds its answers; none of the supplied search results refer to that site specifically, so there is no direct evidence in the provided repor...
AI systems branded as “fact checkers” are increasingly common, but independent testing and journalism show they often make substantive errors, omit context or produce confident but outdated answers — ...
There is clear evidence that many “factual answers” you get from AI systems are themselves AI-generated and can be both useful and error-prone: independent studies found substantial error rates (e.g.,...