Index/Organizations/University of Alaska Fairbanks

University of Alaska Fairbanks

University

Fact-Checks

11 results
Nov 19, 2025
Most Viewed

what happened to building 7 on 9/11

NIST’s final investigation concluded that fires — ignited by debris from the North Tower — heated floor beams and girders, led a critical internal column to fail, and triggered a fire‑induced progress...

Nov 30, 2025
Most Viewed

did building 7 WTC collapse normally or artificially?

NIST concluded that WTC 7 collapsed because fires, fed by office contents and ignited by debris from the Twin Towers, caused a critical column to fail and a subsequent progressive, fire-induced collap...

Dec 13, 2025
Most Viewed

Which professional engineering groups outside ASCE examined the WTC collapses and what alternative hypotheses did they propose?

Multiple professional engineering teams and independent researchers investigated the World Trade Center collapses beyond ASCE/ASME-led efforts; prominent groups include university researchers (e.g., Z...

Nov 21, 2025

What caused the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 on September 11, 2001?

The dominant official explanation is that WTC 7’s collapse at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, was initiated by fires ignited when debris from the nearby North Tower struck the building and burned unc...

Nov 18, 2025

What caused building 7 to fall on 9/11

Two competing explanations appear in the available reporting: the U.S. government science agency NIST concluded WTC 7 collapsed because fires—ignited by debris from the Twin Towers—progressed and prod...

Jan 1, 2026

Which organizations (NIST, FEMA, peer-reviewed journals) investigated the WTC collapses and what methods did they use?

Two federal efforts—the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s early Building Performance Study (BPAT) with the American Society of Civil Engineers, and the National Institute of Standards and Technolo...

Dec 17, 2025

How have structural engineering and aviation experts explained the World Trade Center collapses?

Structural and aviation experts who have analyzed the World Trade Center collapses conclude the towers succumbed to a sequence of impact damage, large uncontrolled fires fed by jet fuel, and progressi...

Dec 13, 2025

How did independent structural engineers critique or support the NIST 2005 and 2008 WTC investigation findings?

Independent structural engineers offered both measured endorsements and sharp criticisms of NIST’s 2005 (Towers) and 2008 (WTC 7) reports: many in the professional community accepted NIST’s procedural...

Dec 4, 2025

How have building codes and high-rise fire-safety standards changed since the WTC 7 collapse in 2001?

NIST’s WTC investigations produced 31 recommendations and later 13 WTC‑7–specific recommendations aimed at structural integrity, fire endurance, evacuation and responder communications; many U.S. code...

Dec 4, 2025

What role did the building's design and tenant equipment (like diesel generators) play in WTC 7's failure?

NIST concluded that WTC 7’s collapse began when a critical interior column (Column 79) failed after fire-induced damage to adjacent floor systems and connections, triggered by uncontrolled fires that ...

Oct 30, 2025

How did independent engineering groups like the American Society of Civil Engineers respond to 9/11 structural collapse explanations?

The engineering community produced two clear, competing narratives after 9/11: mainstream, peer-reviewed engineering analyses and official investigations concluded aircraft impact combined with prolon...