Your fact-checks will appear here
Scientific and public debate centers on whether fluoride is a "neurotoxin" — many peer‑reviewed reviews and the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) report conclude higher fluoride exposures (notabl...
The short answer is that : the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) placed RF fields in Group 2B (“possibly carcinogenic to humans”) in 2011, and later animal and epidemiological studies...
The short answer: current evidence does not prove that aspartame causes cancer, but it also does not settle the question—major reviews disagree and recent human studies have produced mixed signals tha...
is not a simple hazard-or-harmless question: at low, controlled levels it is a proven dental public‑health tool that reduces cavities, but at higher or uncontrolled exposures it can cause clear harms ...
Animal studies and regulatory reviews show mixed findings: many preclinical studies report little or no acute/sub‑acute toxicity for “pristine” C60, but inhalation and some functionalized or impure pr...
Major recent reviews and meta-analyses report an association between higher fluoride exposure and lower childhood IQ, with one pooled analysis across 74 studies finding about a 1.6–1.7 point IQ decrem...
Public-health authorities and recent systematic reviews say fluoride can be toxic at high concentrations in drinking water, and multiple major reviews conclude harm is most consistently observed at or...