Your fact-checks will appear here
Scientific and public debate centers on whether fluoride is a "neurotoxin" — many peer‑reviewed reviews and the U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP) report conclude higher fluoride exposures (notabl...
The short answer is that : the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) placed RF fields in Group 2B (“possibly carcinogenic to humans”) in 2011, and later animal and epidemiological studies...
The short answer: current evidence does not prove that aspartame causes cancer, but it also does not settle the question—major reviews disagree and recent human studies have produced mixed signals tha...
Animal studies and regulatory reviews show mixed findings: many preclinical studies report little or no acute/sub‑acute toxicity for “pristine” C60, but inhalation and some functionalized or impure pr...
Major recent reviews and meta-analyses report an association between higher fluoride exposure and lower childhood IQ, with one pooled analysis across 74 studies finding about a 1.6–1.7 point IQ decrem...
Public-health authorities and recent systematic reviews say fluoride can be toxic at high concentrations in drinking water, and multiple major reviews conclude harm is most consistently observed at or...