Your fact-checks will appear here
The highest court in the U.S. state of Wisconsin
Federal courts have largely allowed private, provider‑initiated automated scans for child sexual abuse material (CSAM) to proceed without a warrant under the “private search” doctrine, but recent appe...
currently enforces post‑employment non‑compete covenants only when they are tied to protecting legitimate employer interests and are reasonable in time and geographic scope under Wis. Stat. § 103.465 ...
Hash-value matches to known CSAM can sometimes give police probable cause but do not automatically eliminate Fourth Amendment requirements; courts are divided on whether a provider’s automated hash ma...
Koch-linked groups have spent tens of millions on lobbying, advertising and legal strategy to shape legislation and high‑court cases—examples include a $20m AFP effort backing Trump tax-cut extensions...
Elon Musk and affiliated groups publicly offered and in some cases paid money to Wisconsin voters surrounding the 2025 state Supreme Court race: his PAC offered $100 to sign a petition and Musk later ...
Courts at both the state and federal level overwhelmingly rejected legal efforts to overturn or invalidate the certified result of the 2020 presidential election, dismissing many claims for lack of ev...
Courts can and have been used to challenge Texas redistricting decisions made before 2025: multiple federal lawsuits contest mid‑decade maps, and one consolidated case seeks orders to block the state’...