Your fact-checks will appear here
Journal
The Supreme Court in Trump v. United States held that presidents receive broad immunity for certain official acts — absolute immunity for core presidential functions and at least presumptive immunity ...
The Supreme Court’s major immunity ruling held that presidents enjoy absolute criminal immunity for acts that are “core” or “official” executive functions and a form of presumptive immunity for other ...
JD Vance served four years in the U.S. Marine Corps (2003–2007), used the Post‑9/11 GI Bill and Yellow Ribbon benefits to fund college, graduated summa cum laude from Ohio State in 2009, then enrolled...
International humanitarian law (IHL) bars direct attacks on civilian infrastructure unless that infrastructure meets the legal test of a *military objective*—a narrow definition that requires a direct...
J.D. Vance earned his Bachelor of Arts from The Ohio State University in 2009 and his Juris Doctor from Yale Law School in 2013 . Multiple reputable outlets — including Britannica, Business Insider an...
’s decision to apply to Law School was driven primarily by a desire to escape and remake the trajectory set by a —a legal education he saw as a pathway to social mobility and credibility—rather than b...
The principal arguments for reforming Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) rather than abolishing it center on preserving institutional capacity for immigration enforcement and public safety, pur...
The Supreme Court’s ruling recognizing substantial presidential immunity for “official acts” cited a mix of constitutional structure, Founding-era practice, and prior immunity and separation‑of‑powers...
The Supreme Court has ruled that a President enjoys absolute immunity for “core” presidential powers and at least presumptive immunity for other official acts, shielding some in-office conduct from cr...
The Supreme Court’s 2024–2025 rulings—most notably Trump v. United States—expanded presidential immunity for acts tied to official functions, a change legal analysts say gives presidents “vast new imm...
The Supreme Court’s Trump v. United States decision holds that presidents enjoy at least presumptive immunity for “official acts” and absolute immunity for a narrow core of exclusively presidential po...
Research and reporting show that a prosecutor’s politics can matter — through elections, appointments, and policy directives — and that political alignment has been linked to who runs and wins prosecu...