Your fact-checks will appear here
American anthropologist
The Patterson–Gimlin film remains unresolved: mainstream science does not accept Bigfoot as established, but . Analyses since the 1990s — including forensic gait studies, film-integrity examinations, ...
The Patterson–Gimlin film (PGF) of 1967 remains debated: a subset of primatologists and hominologists conclude the footage is , while many mainstream primatologists and skeptics treat it as unproven o...
Scientific inquiry into Sasquatch (Bigfoot) has produced a mix of anecdote-driven material—hundreds of eyewitness reports, footprints, photos, audio and plaster casts—and a few contested laboratory an...
No footprint cast or soil imprint universally accepted as proof of Bigfoot has been authenticated by the mainstream forensic podiatry or soil‑analysis communities; a handful of casts have been treated...
Experts offer a spectrum of explanations for alleged Bigfoot footprints that ranges from deliberate hoaxes and misidentified animal tracks to complex forensic claims about dermatoglyphics and unusual ...
Multiple universities and at least one U.S. federal agency have appeared in the record as participants or at least as having handled inquiries or samples related to Bigfoot/Sasquatch research: notable...
Reputable scientists and institutions have occasionally tested alleged Bigfoot physical evidence—most notably genetic analyses of hair samples and forensic examinations of footprints—but mainstream co...