Your fact-checks will appear here
American actor and comedian
in v. held in a 6–3 decision that presidents enjoy absolute immunity for a "core" of official acts and at least presumptive immunity for other official acts, while denying immunity for purely unoffici...
Photos and video from Donald Trump’s Jan. 20, 2025 inauguration show him reciting the oath with his right hand raised while his left hand remained at his side; Melania Trump held two Bibles nearby but...
The Supreme Court’s July 2024 decision in Trump v. United States holds that former presidents have absolute immunity for "core" constitutional functions and presumptive immunity for other official act...
President Donald Trump did not place his left hand on the Bibles held by First Lady Melania Trump while reciting the presidential oath at his January 20, 2025 inauguration, a detail captured in photos...
Former U.S. presidents can be arrested and charged for alleged criminal conduct committed in their personal capacity or under state law, but immunity doctrines and recent Supreme Court precedent have ...
has issued a mix of specific and vague prophecies—ranging from claims that “the real is dead” and “drinks children’s blood” to predictions of financial collapse at and that would murder the Queen—and ...
The reporting and opinions show this was not a 7–2 decision but a sharply divided 6–3 Supreme Court ruling that recognized substantial presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for some official...
The Supreme Court in Trump v. United States (decided July 1, 2024) held 6–3 that a president enjoys immunity from criminal prosecution for certain “official” acts: absolute immunity for a core set of ...
The Supreme Court’s 6–3 ruling in Trump v. United States created a three-tier framework that gives presidents “absolute” immunity for a narrow set of core official acts, presumptive immunity for other...
in v. set a three-part framework: for acts within a president’s core constitutional powers, presumptive immunity for acts within the “outer perimeter” of official responsibility, and no immunity for “...
The vacated the ’s immunity ruling and remanded v. to the district court with instructions to make factbound determinations about which of the indictment’s allegations—especially those involving attem...
’s principal holding in the -era travel ban litigation came in , where a 5–4 majority upheld Proclamation 9645 as within the President’s statutory and constitutional authority, giving broad deference ...
Court has both overturned longstanding precedents in landmark, high-profile cases and left many precedents intact, producing a mixed record rather than a simple retreat from stare decisis; empiricists...
The ’s July 1, 2024 decision in v. did not simply “reject” or fully endorse former President Trump’s broad immunity theory; the Court issued a divided 6–3 opinion carving out substantial immunity for ...
did not reject ’s immunity claims in full; instead the Court in a 6–3 decision recognized broad immunity for official presidential acts, overturned a lower-court ruling that had denied immunity, and s...
did not simply reject or accept "’s final immunity claims" in an all-or-nothing way; in the Court issued a 6–3 opinion that carved out robust constitutional immunities for former presidents with respe...
rejected the claim that a president has complete, categorical immunity from criminal prosecution, instead carving out absolute immunity for a narrow set of “core” constitutional powers and at‑least pr...
The Supreme Court in Trump v. United States established a three‑tiered immunity framework — absolute for core constitutional acts, presumptive for other official acts within the “outer perimeter,” and...
The Constitution gives the House sole power to impeach and the Senate power to convict and remove; Congress has impeached officials for official acts and for conduct the executive claims is within its...
The Supreme Court’s recent jurisprudence on presidential immunity gives the President “absolute” protection for a narrow set of “core” constitutional powers, “presumptive” immunity for other official ...