Your fact-checks will appear here
Researcher (ORCID 0009-0004-7497-960X)
The Supreme Court has decided and acted on multiple high‑profile disputes involving the Trump administration in 2025–2025, including rulings that (a) allowed parts of the administration’s immigration ...
The Supreme Court’s opinion in Trump v. CASA repeatedly cites three district-court opinions from early 2025 — the District of Maryland’s CASA opinion, the Western District of Washington’s decision, an...
U.S. courts have played a mixed but decisive role in policing presidential emergency measures that impinge on civil liberties: at times they have struck down executive excess (Ex parte Milligan, Young...
The Supreme Court and Congress have repeatedly acted to restrain presidential claims of unchecked authority: the Court's rejection of Truman's steel seizure in Youngstown established a lasting framewo...
Congress has both pushed back and faltered: lawmakers proposed and debated war‑powers resolutions to block counternarcotics strikes and even forced floor votes, but partisan splits and procedural hurd...
The materials identify a consistent set of Supreme Court decisions that together define the contours of , with decisions both expanding and constraining executive authority across U.S. history. Key pr...
The Constitution constrains a President’s ability to alter federal programs through three core limits: the Take Care Clause requiring faithful execution of laws, Congress’s authority to define and reg...