Your fact-checks will appear here
American judge
Measure 114 is currently active in parallel state- and federal-court tracks: at the state level the Oregon Court of Appeals reversed a lower court and lifted a hold in March 2025 and the Oregon Suprem...
Federal and appellate courts have broadly constrained recent presidential orders to federalize state National Guard units, finding legal limits on using federal Title 10 authority to put Guard troops ...
Oregon’s statewide 2025 gun statutes — principally Measure 114 (permit-to-purchase, background-check tightening, and a ban on large-capacity magazines) — have been repeatedly enjoined and un-enjoined ...
Federal courts have long treated presidential invocations of the Insurrection Act as presumptively political and thus often nonjusticiable, but that deference has limits: courts have intervened where ...
Federal courts in multiple recent suits have pushed back on executive deployments that blurred law‑enforcement and military roles, enjoining or finding violations where judges concluded troops perform...
Federal courts in Oregon have split legal terrain since 2023: U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut ruled Measure 114’s ban on magazines over 10 rounds and its permit‑to‑purchase regime are constitutiona...
President Trump and some GOP officials repeatedly described Portland as “war-ravaged” and a “war zone,” prompting federal troop moves and lawsuits; federal judge Karin Immergut found that characteriza...
There is no clear, uncontested evidence that Portland in 2025 faced ongoing violent unrest that would meet the commonly accepted legal or practical thresholds for a sustained National Guard deployment...