Your fact-checks will appear here
Family name
A recent federal district court dismissed a possession charge tied to wholly AI‑generated obscene images, finding Section 1466A unconstitutional as applied to private possession of virtual CSAM—invoki...
Courts have addressed defenses for accidental or inadvertent viewing or possession of child pornography, with judicial rulings and legal commentary repeatedly emphasizing that for many child‑pornograp...
Federal and lower courts are starting to draw a sharp line between AI- or computer-generated sexual images that do not involve real children and material that is based on or depicts actual minors, wit...
Federal and state law uniformly criminalize possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), but courts have split on whether passive viewing alone counts as “possession”; some jurisdictions treat in...
Courts decide whether an image is "virtually indistinguishable" from a real child by applying statutory language, Supreme Court precedents, jury fact-finding and expert technical evidence to assess wh...