Your fact-checks will appear here
American legal scholar
Federal immigration officers do have legal protections when acting within their federal duties, rooted in doctrines like Supremacy Clause immunity and related precedents; but those protections are not...
The military’s power to recall retired officers for court-martial rests chiefly on the Uniform Code of Military Justice — notably Article 2 and the recall statute 10 U.S.C. § 688 — and decades of appe...
The available reporting documents at least three denaturalization proceedings the Department of Justice initiated or announced in 2025 — the filings or outcomes in the cases of a Louisiana defendant k...
U.S. courts have long treated denaturalization as a narrow, judicially constrained remedy for fraud or concealment in the naturalization process, and courts have recognized that children or spouses wh...
Retired servicemembers who receive retirement pay can, in many circumstances, be recalled to active duty and tried by court-martial; appellate and Supreme Court precedents and Pentagon practice suppor...
Federal courts have long treated presidential invocations of the Insurrection Act as presumptively political and thus often nonjusticiable, but that deference has limits: courts have intervened where ...
Dual nationality itself is not newly criminalized, but recent legislation proposals (Exclusive Citizenship Act of 2025) would force citizens to choose one nationality or face automatic loss of U.S. ci...
Three appellate courts have upheld the constitutionality of court-martialing retired servicemembers, creating a legal foundation the Pentagon can invoke in Sen. Mark Kelly’s case . Legal scholars and ...
The Pentagon has opened a review of “serious allegations of misconduct” against Senator Mark Kelly, a retired U.S. Navy captain, after he appeared in a video urging service members to refuse illegal o...