Your fact-checks will appear here
American politician (born 1965)
The Supreme Court issued a major decision (Trump v. United States) that narrowed prosecutions of presidents by recognizing immunity for many “official acts” and absolute immunity for a subset of core ...
Charlie Kirk made public statements asserting that Black Americans were “better” or “better off” in the 1940s (or that they were better off under earlier conditions such as before the Civil Rights Act...
The Supreme Court did rule on presidential immunity in the 2024–25 litigation often called Trump v. United States, issuing a decision that, according to multiple legal analyses, grants a former Presid...
Charlie Kirk publicly called the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 “a huge mistake” and has argued the law produced a “permanent DEI‑type bureaucracy” that he says limits free speech; those stat...
Charlie Kirk publicly said the 1960s Civil Rights Act was “a huge mistake” and that passing it produced long-term harms such as a “permanent DEI‑type bureaucracy” and limits on free speech; those rema...
Multiple news outlets and fact-checkers confirm Charlie Kirk publicly said the Civil Rights Act was “a huge mistake,” and several lawmakers and legacy civil‑rights organizations issued formal response...
Congress can propose laws but cannot easily overturn the Supreme Court’s new immunity doctrine on its own; only a constitutional amendment or a future Supreme Court decision can fully undo the high co...
The Supreme Court in Trump v. United States (July 1, 2024) held 6–3 that a former president is absolutely immune for a “core” set of official acts and at least presumptively immune for other official ...
The 2025 Republican budget proposals prioritize cutting Medicare spending by targeting private practices and implementing administrative controls that proponents say reduce fraud and cost, while criti...