Index/Topics/18 U.S.C. § 111

18 U.S.C. § 111

A law that criminalizes assault on federal officers

Fact-Checks

5 results
Jan 25, 2026
Most Viewed

How have courts defined when a federal officer is "engaged in official duties" for the purposes of § 111?

Courts treat the phrase “engaged in . . . official duties” under as a functional, scope-of-employment inquiry — asking whether the federal employee was acting within the job functions for which they w...

Jan 18, 2026
Most Viewed

What federal statutes have historically been used to prosecute interference with federal officers and how have courts interpreted them?

Federal prosecutors have long relied on a cluster of criminal statutes—most prominently 18 U.S.C. §§ 111, 1114, 115, 1501, and 1503, plus civil-rights and conspiracy provisions such as § 242 and § 372...

Feb 4, 2026

What did the Supreme Court decide in Stands Alone (21‑6826) regarding § 111 and the common‑law assault element?

The materials provided do not include a Supreme Court opinion resolving ; instead they show the petition for certiorari, briefing by amici, and ruling that § 111 does not require the common‑law offens...

Jan 16, 2026

How does DHS define and classify an 'assault' against federal officers in its public data releases?

The Department of Homeland Security’s public use-of-force dataset groups incidents into three categories—officer use of force, subject assault against officer, and maritime vessel disabling fire—but t...

Jan 15, 2026

How does 18 U.S.C. §111 interact with state assault laws when federal and state jurisdictions overlap?

When a defendant assaults a federal officer or commits an assault on federal property, 18 U.S.C. § 111 creates a parallel federal avenue for prosecution that can carry higher or different penalties th...