Your fact-checks will appear here
The topic involves the litigation landscape following the 2020 election, including the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. United States and the implications for election mechanics and fraud-based injunctions.
Claims that White Africans face systemic, race-based persecution have circulated in media and politics; some targeted incidents and U.S. policy gestures have amplified those claims, but broad empirica...
citizens possess multiple legal and institutional avenues to challenge a : federal criminal statutes and civil remedies enforced by the and private parties; state-led litigation and state control over...
State and local governments do not appear to have a single, publicly compiled dollar figure for how much they spent responding to post‑2020 election litigation and the unrest that followed; available ...
No clear precedent exists in which a state or federal court has solely because of chain-of-custody or other procedural handling errors; courts confronted with such allegations in the typically rejecte...
has secured multiple favorable rulings in two related civil suits against : a jury found Trump sexually abused her and defamed her, producing a $5 million award that an appeals court upheld, and a sep...
Federal appellate courts and the repeatedly narrowed the legal paths available to broad , often rejecting requests to block ballot counting or to disqualify candidates while permitting discrete litiga...