Your fact-checks will appear here
Federal courts found that DHS and HHS failed to provide reasoned decision-making under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Federal judges since 2024 have both constrained and scrutinized ICE’s renewed practice of arresting people at immigration courthouses, issuing regional injunctions and detailed rulings that find const...
The secured by 20 states have materially narrowed how the can share Medicaid data with the , blocking broad transfers and use of sensitive health and mixed‑status household data while permitting limit...
The Supreme Court treated the citizenship-question fight as a mixed legal outcome: it recognized the Secretary of Commerce’s statutory authority to ask about citizenship but blocked the specific 2020 ...
Federal courts have repeatedly used preliminary injunctions and temporary restraining orders to limit federal agents’ tactics at protests—narrowly tailored orders that bar arrests, detentions, or use ...
City and state plaintiffs have won or obtained injunctions against federal attempts to withhold funds by framing their claims around separation of powers and Spending Clause limits, alleging executive...
Yes — retired officers have sometimes prevailed in federal litigation challenging retirement‑grade reductions, usually not by securing an across‑the‑board rule against the practice but by persuading c...
Yes — preservation groups have brought legal challenges to President Donald Trump’s recent alterations to the White House, most notably a lawsuit seeking to halt demolition and construction tied to a ...
Two tracks dominate the legal battlefield when an administration issues sweeping executive orders or removes inspectors general: courts and Congress. Litigants commonly pursue injunctive and declarato...
The Biden administration’s efforts to unwind the Trump-era “Remain in Mexico” (MPP) and to end Title 42 expulsions were repeatedly reshaped by a web of federal court rulings, appellate decisions and a...