Your fact-checks will appear here
The distinction between administrative and judicial warrants in the context of ICE forced home entries.
Federal immigration officers may arrest people in public without a judge’s sign‑off, but the Constitution and federal guidance draw a bright line around private homes: absent consent or a recognized e...
The Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures applies to ICE just as it does to other federal officers: public spaces generally carry a lower expectation of privacy so q...
The legal landscape that governs ICE entries into homes and enforcement at "sensitive locations" is shaped more by statutes, agency policy memos, and administrative practice than by a single controlli...
When forcibly enters a private home without a judicial warrant, have repeatedly treated those entries as potential violations and granted a mix of remedies: declaratory rulings that the entry was unco...
Federal immigration arrests are constrained by the Fourth Amendment: ICE generally may not force its way into private homes or the non‑public areas of businesses without a judicial (criminal) warrant,...