Your fact-checks will appear here
The practice of using celebrity names for marketing products without formal authorization.
is marketed as a natural fat‑burning supplement that promises to boost metabolism, curb appetite and increase energy, but the independent reporting available shows mixed user testimonials, inconsisten...
Investigations by independent trackers and news outlets have exposed the techniques and distribution networks behind LipoLess-style deepfake ad campaigns, showing AI-generated celebrity and doctor end...
There is a registered for the name “DR. PHIL” owned by , listed in third‑party trademark databases , but the reporting provided contains no definitive filing or corporate record that directly ties or ...
Calling a review site "" is a blunt reaction but not automatically wrong: review platforms range from rigorous labs and critic aggregators to open forums rife with , and the truth sits between helpful...
is a marketed that appears widely promoted across affiliate and review sites and exists as a consumer product, but the available reporting shows conflicting ingredient claims, questionable endorsement...
It is possible that some sources cited on are nonexistent, fabricated, or generated; the site's own legal and commercial disclosures create both the permissive environment and the incentive structure ...
There is no reporting in the provided sources that Dr. Mehmet Oz or his public relations team issued a specific, contemporary statement addressing “Gelatide” by name; available pieces characterize Gel...
Neurocept did not, based on the available reporting, publicly disclose verifiable funding sources or formal sponsors for the viral Ben Carson promotional spot; independent fact-checking found the head...