Your fact-checks will appear here
The use of AI to generate child sexual abuse material, and the challenges it poses for detection and prevention.
A steady stream of law-enforcement press releases and reporting shows arrests tied to CSAM stored or shared via cloud services, peer-to-peer networks, cyberlockers, and even AI-generated files; invest...
in the production and distribution of sexualized images of minors, and on its platform, but the reporting does not show clear evidence that Grok itself performs a dedicated, proactive scan of the imag...
The probability of being detected for involvement with child sexual abuse material (CSAM) does not follow a simple countdown where risk reliably falls after a fixed period; instead, detection depends ...
Commercial -detection products from and combine traditional hash‑matching against known illicit files with machine‑learning classifiers that operate on image embeddings and text classifiers to surface...
Exposure to child sexual abuse material (CSAM) on Instagram is terrifying but not automatically criminal; platforms remove and investigate such content, and U.S. law criminalizes possession and distri...
Federal law already criminalizes knowingly accessing child sexual abuse material () “with intent to view,” but there is no single, authoritative list in the provided reporting that maps every state’s ...
Prosecuting child sexual abuse material () offenses rooted in the is repeatedly hampered by technical anonymity, vast volumes of material, uneven legal tools, and constrained investigative resources, ...
There are no reports in the provided sources that any ChatGPT users have been criminally charged specifically for creating AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) using ChatGPT; the recent hig...
most commonly learn that someone has viewed through platform and industry reporting—hash-matching, automated classifiers and hotline referrals—followed by targeted forensic examinations once devices o...
If a person used Grok to generate child sexual abuse material (CSAM) but law enforcement’s search recovered zero photos or videos because the illicit images only ever existed inside Grok or ephemeral ...
OpenAI does ban users who attempt to generate or upload child sexual abuse material (CSAM) and reports confirmed attempts to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC), and the com...
child sexual abuse material (CSAM) investigations by hiding who controls distribution, scattering forensic traces across jurisdictions and technologies, and overwhelming reporting systems—all while pl...
Current and perceptual/hash‑matching tools form complementary lines of defense: hashing reliably identifies previously documented with very low false positives but fails on “new” or synthetically gene...
Forensic examiners authenticate whether suspected child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is of a real child or AI-generated by combining technical image provenance tools (hashing, artifact detection, meta...
Recent reporting shows law enforcement continues to arrest users tied to CSAM circulated on mainstream forums and social platforms (not solely the dark web), with investigations using cyber tips, plat...
Law enforcement treats forums that mix legal material with CSAM as high-priority, complex targets that require a combination of technical detection, legal preservation and targeted investigative work ...
classifiers combine perceptual hashing and machine-learning classifiers to find known illegal images and predict novel abuse imagery, but their strengths—scale and speed—come with measurable limits: h...
Federal law criminalizes not only possession and distribution of child sexual abuse material () but also "knowingly accesses with intent to view" it, a statutory phrase inserted into the federal CSAM ...
Journalists and forensic analysts by combining device-level provenance and metadata checks, forensic image analysis that looks for pixel- and physics-level anomalies, and AI‑assisted detection tools—a...
Automatic browser or device caching can, in many prosecutions, be a powerful line of defense against —but it is not a guaranteed or standalone exoneration; courts look to whether the defendant knew of...