Your fact-checks will appear here
The legality of AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) is being debated in courts, with some judges ruling that it is protected by the First Amendment, while prosecutors argue that it is criminal.
A recent federal district court dismissed a possession charge tied to wholly AI‑generated obscene images, finding Section 1466A unconstitutional as applied to private possession of virtual CSAM—invoki...
Federal and lower courts are starting to draw a sharp line between AI- or computer-generated sexual images that do not involve real children and material that is based on or depicts actual minors, wit...
Creating, distributing, or possessing AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) has been treated as illegal by many federal agencies and advocates, but key constitutional and statutory nuances m...