Your fact-checks will appear here
The provision in the U.S. Constitution that prohibits federal religious tests
The short answer: no—scholarly consensus and founding-era documents show the was not legally established as a Christian nation, even though Christian belief and rhetoric heavily shaped early American ...
Federal criminal law that directly targets protesters who interrupt religious services is narrow: criminalizes damage to religious property and the obstruction of persons in the free exercise of relig...
opened a civil‑rights probe and arrested several activists after anti‑ICE protesters disrupted a worship service at , alleging violations of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act; howev...
sit at the intersection of robust for speech and distinct legal protections for ; courts routinely draw a line between lawful expressive activity (often permitted on public sidewalks) and disruptive o...
courts have treated disputes over religious displays, school policy, and government endorsement of religion through evolving—and sometimes conflicting—doctrinal tests that ask whether government actio...
The phrase "" in public life is a constitutional principle derived from the First Amendment’s Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses and a longer history of colonial disestablishmentism, but it is ne...
is a broad religious-legal tradition guiding ritual life, family relations, commercial conduct and criminal categories within Islamic jurisprudence; in practice it predominantly governs private, volun...
The short answer: was neither founded as a straightforward “” nor as a purely secular republic; the historical record shows consistent in colonial life and rhetoric alongside Enlightenment and theisti...