Your fact-checks will appear here
Forensic analysis of audio recordings
Public reporting and technical literature do not provide a public, documented forensics report specifically naming the techniques used to analyze the so‑called “Frazzledrip” materials; therefore the o...
Independent journalists responding to the viral Sascha/Sasha Riley Substack audio have largely taken a cautious, verification-first posture: they have identified gaps—chiefly identity confirmation, ac...
Authenticating a viral audio recording is a multi-step forensic process that begins with intake and chain-of-custody preservation, proceeds through technical file-level and acoustic analyses to detect...
Journalists and investigators authenticate viral survivor testimony and audio by combining provenance and identity checks, technical forensics, corroboration with independent records, and careful asse...
Forensic audio authentication in high‑profile abuse cases follows a multi-step, scientifically grounded workflow combining file‑level forensics, signal analysis, and contextual validation to determine...
To independently verify an audio testimony like Sasha Riley’s, investigators follow a layered process: secure and document the recording’s provenance, subject the file to forensic analysis and authent...
Journalists verifying viral audio rely on a mix of newsroom verification, human listening and specialized forensic techniques—starting with provenance and chain-of-custody checks and extending to spec...
Investigative reporters combine technical forensic work, archival research and transparent sourcing: they first treat viral audio as evidence to be transcribed and forensically examined for manipulati...
When unredacted survivor audio alleges crimes by powerful figures, newsrooms lean on long-established verification and legal standards — corroboration, fairness, and minimizing harm — rather than publ...