Your fact-checks will appear here
Civil suits against federal officers via Bivens-type claims have been narrowed by courts.
Families alleging by federal agents can pursue criminal charges under federal statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 242, civil suits under doctrines derived from or analogous remedies, administrative complaints a...
Civil remedies against ICE for harms during operations fall into a narrow set of federal civil‑rights and tort claims—most commonly Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) suits, limited Bivens constitutional ...
Federal appellate and district courts have split on whether ICE may enter homes without judicial warrants and what remedies victims may obtain: many lower courts and district judges have held warrantl...
U.S. citizens alleging wrongful detention or assault by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have pursued a mix of remedies—administrative FTCA claims against the federal government, civil-rights...
Suing ICE usually means suing the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for torts like false arrest or wrongful detention, or suing federal officers individually for constitutional vi...
To prove a wrongful arrest by ICE in federal court, plaintiffs typically must assemble documentary proof showing lack of probable cause or absence of lawful warrant authority, exhaust administrative r...
Multiple federal actors — internal DHS oversight offices, the Department of Justice (including U.S. Attorneys and the FBI), congressional investigatory committees, and the federal courts — play distin...