Your fact-checks will appear here
The security features of different browsers and their impact on fingerprint resistance
is a privacy-hardened fork of Firefox that emphasizes removing telemetry and disabling features that can leak data (including selectively disabling WebGL), while is a Chromium-based browser positioned...
store passwords in a local SQLite database and encrypt those password blobs with whose protection depends on the operating system’s secret stores (, , ) or on per-user encryption schemes like Chromium...
Brave’s documented behavior and user reports show two consistent facts: uninstalling the Brave app removes local browser data (including passwords) unless the user has separately backed them up or syn...
like uBlock Origin and Privacy Badger materially shift which browser+search-engine combinations offer the strongest fingerprint resistance by adding or duplicating defenses, but they do not make every...
most consistently remove or disable telemetry, cross‑site data sharing and third‑party tracking, and they restrict or disable extensions and bundled services to reduce fingerprinting; reporting links ...
without exposing plaintext is practical if one uses direct encrypted import paths offered by reputable , avoids intermediate CSV files or—if unavoidable—encrypts and securely destroys export files, an...
A website reliably detects a download when its server receives HTTP requests for a resource or when client-side analytics run while rendering content, so there is no perfect client-side way to stop a ...
NoScript is a free, open-source browser extension that blocks active web content (scripts, plugins, frames) by default and lets users enable dynamic content only for trusted sites, positioned as a sec...
Vulnerabilities in browsers, plugins, or exit nodes can and have revealed Tor users’ real IP addresses and locations, but the risk depends on where the flaw lies and how it is exploited: client-side b...