Your fact-checks will appear here
Laws and regulations regarding child pornography worldwide, including variations in definitions and enforcement.
Illinois law expressly criminalizes sexual conduct with animals, and state statutes and practice treat sexually explicit depictions involving minors or other prohibited categories with severe penaltie...
Most authoritative statutes aimed at operate at the federal level and target visual depictions, while states vary and rarely criminalize purely written or fictional narratives about minors except wher...
Most countries prohibit the production of sexually explicit material involving persons under 18, but international reporting and datasets show important gaps, variation in definitions (age of “child,”...
Briefly visiting a clear‑web nudist website by itself has not been shown in the provided reporting to be a routine basis for arrest; legal Q&A sources consistently conclude that accidental or momentar...
and state law treat any sexually explicit depiction of persons under 18 as a grave criminal offense: production typically carries the harshest mandatory penalties (often 15–30 years), distribution/tra...
generally require proof that a defendant knew the material depicted a minor and intentionally possessed or sought it, so proving “” typically demands evidence of active seeking or control rather than ...
operates as a centralized intake for suspected and reviews incoming reports before forwarding them to law enforcement when appropriate . Decisions about which agency receives a CyberTip generally rest...
U.S. courts have long drawn a line between protected speech and criminal content—routinely holding that child pornography is unprotected and that possession or viewing can be criminalized—yet the mate...
A conviction under requires the government to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that an adult produced a visual depiction of sexually explicit conduct involving a person who was a minor, that the defe...
imposes some of the toughest statutory penalties for -related offenses among major democracies, with and long maximum sentences—first-time federal production or extraterritorial production convictions...
Federal appellate courts have carved divergent paths on how discovery in is handled: some circuits emphasize government control and the statutory limitation on copying alleged images under 18 U.S.C. §...
International instruments and model laws pushed a clear standard—“child” = anyone under 18—for sexual‑exploitation and child‑pornography rules, but national statutes vary in wording and scope; the EU ...
Producing or distributing pornographic content involving persons legally defined as children typically triggers severe criminal consequences—imprisonment, fines, mandatory reporting and cross‑border c...
Federal prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2252 and § 2252A require the government to prove a small set of core elements: that a defendant knowingly engaged in a proscribed act (possession, receipt, distr...
Japan raised its national age of sexual consent from 13 to 16 in 2023, bringing the statutory baseline closer to many Western countries, while a patchwork of prefectural bylaws and separate statutes r...
Mere online access to an image can in some circumstances be charged as possession of illegal content, because U.S. federal statutes and many state laws treat electronic receipt, storage, or “accessing...