Your fact-checks will appear here
The topic is about the civil rights and liberties of U.S. citizens, including constitutional protections and the need for judicial warrants.
Federal appellate courts have repeatedly recognized a right to record law-enforcement officers performing their public duties, but the doctrine has been shaped by a patchwork of decisions that allow r...
All-party (often called “two-party”) consent states require that every participant in a private conversation agree before audio can be recorded; most states, and federal law follow one‑party consent, ...
As a matter of law, ’s civil immigration authority does not extend to deporting or removing U.S. citizens — federal guidance and legislative commentary say ICE cannot assert civil immigration enforcem...
If Immigration and Customs Enforcement detains a U.S. citizen by mistake, immediate practical steps—asserting citizenship, producing ID, requesting counsel, and documenting the encounter—are the most ...
The constrains : courts have long held that judicial warrants, consent, or exigent circumstances are required for home entries, and several recent rulings and lawsuits find agency practices — includin...
, employers and workers should immediately—and calmly—ask to see official identification and, if the agent seeks to enter non‑public workplace areas, a judicial warrant; individuals retain the constit...
in is robustly protected by the but not absolute: courts allow “time, place, and manner” restrictions and prohibit speech that incites imminent lawless action or involves violence or property destruct...
grand‑jury subpoenas to seek internal communications, documents and testimony related to interactions with federal immigration authorities and public messaging that could show “cooperation or lack of ...