Your fact-checks will appear here
The court dismissed Katie Johnson's lawsuit on procedural grounds, indicating the complaint did not present sufficient legally actionable claims.
A federal judge dismissed the initial 2016 Katie Johnson complaint in California because it failed to plead an actionable federal civil-rights claim — the court found the pleading made criminal allega...
Federal judges in the dismissed the April 2016 complaint primarily because it did not plead a cognizable and the plaintiff’s request to proceed was denied for that reason, leading to an order terminat...
Judge Dolly M. Gee dismissed the April 2016 federal complaint filed under the name “Katie Johnson” in Riverside, California, after denying the plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis and conc...
">Katie Johnson did not file an appeal after the federal dismissal of her 2016 complaint, and the litigation ended with the plaintiff’s later voluntary withdrawals rather than any appellate decision —...
The original Katie Johnson federal lawsuit filed in April 2016 was dismissed not on the merits of the underlying criminal allegations but because the complaint failed to plead an actionable civil-righ...
Multiple journalistic and fact‑checking inquiries have probed the provenance of the widely circulated “Katie Johnson” video/transcript, finding a mix of primary archival material, promotional activity...