Your fact-checks will appear here
The expansion of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
both expanded and formalized aggressive while also creating legal priorities intended to focus removals on criminals and recent border crossers; critics argue those policies sacrificed individualized ...
Publicly available reporting and government analyses show that far more people were removed from the during than during , but none of the provided sources supply a reliable, comparable count specifica...
The administration employed at the border and expanded interior-enforcement programs such as while also issuing prosecutorial-discretion memos and creating , a mixed toolset that both raised formal re...
’s 2014–2015 immigration directives — notably deferred action expansions () — were met by multi-state lawsuits and conservative legal challenges that culminated in a 4–4 split at the in v. , leaving l...
Yes — the phrase “deporter in chief” was widely used to describe by immigrant‑rights advocates and some critics, reflecting both the high volume of removals during his administration and sharp disagre...
did carry out interior immigration enforcement that included arrests at homes and other in-person encounters, but it did not adopt a formal, nationwide “” or indiscriminate program analogous to police...
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals () and the broader 2014 Immigration Accountability executive actions shifted enforcement from blanket removals toward a prioritized, discretionary approach—offer...