Your fact-checks will appear here
Consumers stuck in deceptive health-product subscription traps should gather evidence, demand refunds, and dispute unauthorized charges
from supplement vendors often show up as small, ambiguous descriptors on bank statements or as “free trial” enrollments that auto-renew; these practices are squarely in regulators’ sights as deceptive...
Marketers exploit celebrity visibility—often by weaving a recognizable name like into promotional funnels—to create demand spikes and lend apparent credibility to dubious weight‑loss supplements (a ph...
Recurring supplement subscription scams lock consumers into ongoing billing through misleading funnels and hidden terms, and issuing a credit card chargeback is a primary remedy consumers use to stop ...
Consumers misled by can seek relief through federal enforcement by the , private lawsuits under the and , and state “right of publicity” claims; regulators have recently tightened rules banning fake a...
When a purchase of a looks like a scam, the immediate playbook is evidence, attempted remediation with the seller and payment provider, and parallel reporting to federal and state consumer-protection ...
from online supplement vendors with poor customer service should first document efforts to resolve the issue with the seller, then escalate to their card issuer for a dispute or chargeback if the vend...
A consumer who sees three charges for a single order is likely facing an , billing error, or merchant-side mistake; federal guidance says companies can’t demand payment for unordered goods and consume...
When an assistant (or anyone acting in a professional role) presents a spouse’s testimony to claim “this product really helped,” the practice raises immediate credibility, transparency, and legal flag...