Your fact-checks will appear here
The use of identity documents in U.S. defamation suits, including the admissibility of documentary evidence and the role of constitutional limits.
State legislatures have moved quickly to criminalize or computer-edited , with dozens of states amending statutes to cover digital, computer-generated, or AI-created visual depictions ; but state cour...
State laws against nonconsensual intimate imagery () form a patchwork: many states criminalize or create civil liability for distributing intimate images without consent, but counts and scopes vary ac...
Section 1466A and Section 2252A are sibling federal statutes created or amended by the to target sexual depictions of minors: §1466A criminalizes obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of ...
Federal criminal courts admit audio recordings when the proponent lays a proper foundation: the recording must be authenticated under Federal Rule of Evidence 901(a), comply with applicable wiretappin...
Documentary and testimonial proof of identity and sex are routinely litigated in U.S. defamation suits: courts admit evidence that is relevant to identification and falsity, subject to the ordinary ru...