Your fact-checks will appear here
The regulation of dietary supplements by the FDA.
The weight of independent reporting and consumer complaints indicates that products marketed as "" — especially variants like "Sugar Control Keto Gummies" pushed via aggressive social ads — display ma...
is presented across consumer-facing reviews as a plant‑based male‑vitality supplement with “no reported side effects” and general tolerability, but the public record available here consists largely of...
A growing body of reporting and peer-reviewed review finds little strong evidence that over‑the‑counter “” supplements reliably improve memory or cognition, while multiple investigations show real saf...
Independent safety data on long‑term use of molecular are sparse but generally reassuring: clinical trials and reviews report very few serious adverse events across thousands of short‑ to medium‑term ...
Consumers who want to know whether a celebrity truly partnered with a supplement brand should check primary, verifiable sources—official press releases, the celebrity’s verified channels, brand filing...
Commercial products marketed as weight‑loss “liquid drops” like have little to no publicly available, peer‑reviewed clinical trial evidence demonstrating efficacy or a robust safety dataset, while man...
Available reporting shows no credible, peer‑reviewed clinical trial data demonstrating that “LipoLess” capsules are safe and effective for weight loss, and independent reviews and consumer complaints ...
, as marketed online, is presented as a “100% natural” liquid supplement produced in an “FDA-registered facility,” but there is no evidence in the provided reporting that the product itself has been r...
Major health organizations agree that no supplement has been proven to prevent, treat, or cure , and guidance stresses caution: some compounds show small or preliminary signals in specific trials whil...
There is no dietary supplement proven to prevent, stop, or reliably reverse ; the strongest, consistent guidance from major health organizations is to prioritize diet, exercise and treating nutrient d...
Weight‑loss patches marketed as sit in a regulatory twilight: the treats supplements differently from drugs and primarily acts after products reach the market, while the polices advertising claims and...
Predatory weight‑loss marketing is easy to spot if one knows the recurrent red flags: guaranteed rapid results, claims that no diet or exercise change is needed, sensational before/after photos and ce...
Consumers seeking to verify third‑party testing and ingredient authenticity for weight‑loss supplements should look for recognized certification seals, check certifier databases or batch reports, and ...
Regulators and fact‑checkers use surveillance, evidence review, cross‑agency coordination, and enforcement tools to identify and remove false health‑product advertising online, relying on specific leg...
Internet marketplace takedowns and seller‑level enforcement produce measurable short‑term reductions in availability of adulterated supplements but fail to reliably prevent repeat sales: the FDA’s war...
In the last five years the Federal Trade Commission has repeatedly pursued companies marketing products — including dietary supplements and at least one nerve‑pain device — with unsupported claims abo...
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has concluded that stronger, clearer oversight is needed for memory and Alzheimer’s dietary supplements and has urged federal agencies to take additional act...
Fit Burn Gummies cannot be certified safe for daily use based on available reporting: regulators warn that weight‑loss supplements can contain hidden, dangerous ingredients , independent analyses say ...