Your fact-checks will appear here
The use of digital evidence in investigations
Federal law treats images of sexually explicit conduct by minors as contraband and criminalizes production, distribution, receipt and possession of that material; by contrast the statute does not neat...
have split along lines of technology and mens rea: circuits have generally upheld prosecutions based on hyperlinks and active stings while taking a more cautious approach where possession depends on ,...
Viral, unverified allegations have a double-edged history: they can force stalled or covered-up abuse into formal inquiry, but they also reshape investigative priorities, encourage hasty classificatio...
Prosecutors seeking to prove electronic possession of online images rely on a chain of technical artifacts—forensic disk and phone images, cryptographic file hashes, file-system and application metada...
Prosecutors corroborate network logs in digital CSAM prosecutions by treating logs as one piece of a multilayered evidentiary mosaic: creating forensically sound copies, aligning timestamps and metada...
Digital forensic methods most frequently contested in child pornography prosecutions include automated identification software, metadata and file-attribution techniques, chain-of-custody and seizure p...
VPN use by a suspect can and often does create real investigative and evidentiary complications in CSAM cases: it obscures origin information, interacts with encryption and anonymizing tools used by o...
Rotated or transient logging—where system logs overwrite or age out data—can and does impede specific digital forensics trails, but it is only one factor among many that make pursuing CSAM downloaders...