Your fact-checks will appear here
The Justice Department's transparency in releasing the Epstein files.
No criminal charges were filed against Representative Jim Jordan in connection with the Jeffrey Epstein investigation as reported in the documents and news coverage reviewed; the public record and rel...
The released Justice Department tranches of the Jeffrey Epstein files contain numerous mentions of Donald Trump — ranging from media clippings and photographs to investigators’ notes and at least one ...
Prosecutors face a thicket of procedural, evidentiary and institutional obstacles before they can charge people alleged to have abetted : prior agreements and sealed or redacted records tied to the ma...
Fact-checkers and major newsrooms have approached with skeptical, evidence-first scrutiny: they debunked viral misreadings, flagged technical and procedural redaction failures, and stressed that raw d...
’s political links was sharply partisan: conservative outlets and Republican-aligned investigators foregrounded Clinton-era and Democratic connections early and framed document releases as proof of wr...
A president cannot simply "unilaterally" fling open federal or sealed records because , courts, federal secrecy rules and victim-protection statutes create interlocking legal limits on disclosure; the...
The DOJ’s published Epstein data sets include categories beyond court filings—most prominently flight logs and travel records, Epstein’s contacts book and photographs, seized electronic evidence (driv...
The Justice Department’s phased releases of Jeffrey Epstein files show investigators compiled references to potential “co‑conspirators,” pursued interviews and possible charges, and in a few cases nam...