Your fact-checks will appear here
Claims that Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas benefited financially or otherwise from Jeffrey Epstein, despite available reporting showing no direct evidence of such benefits.
The publicly released documents and multiple secondary compilations include references to , but being named or pictured in the is not itself evidence of wrongdoing and the releases so far are heavily ...
No reporting in the provided document set identifies any specific DOJ-released Epstein file that names ; the public coverage and DOJ statements about the release emphasize references to other prominen...
Since 2019, mainstream media and professional fact‑checkers have treated claims tying Supreme Court Justice to with caution: sensational allegations have circulated online, but established outlets and...