Your fact-checks will appear here
A process that allowed for the rapid removal of unauthorized immigrants without full adjudication.
Expedited removal is a streamlined statutory process that allows DHS to quickly remove certain noncitizens found inadmissible under specified grounds without the usual full removal hearing before an i...
is a streamlined federal process that allows officers to quickly remove certain noncitizens deemed inadmissible for arrival-related grounds without a full hearing before an immigration judge . Its sta...
Expedited removal and reinstatement were summary, out‑of‑court procedures used heavily under to remove people believed to lack lawful entry or who had previously been removed and returned; they allowe...
The 1996 immigration statutes—most notably the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA)—reconfigured U.S. deportation law by replacing the old exclusion/deportation framewo...
is a statutory process that allows officers to summarily deny admission and deport certain noncitizens without a full immigration‑court hearing under INA §235(b) and related statutes . Under current l...
Across the dominant trend was a shift toward nonjudicial, border-focused removals: in key years cited by DHS and analyzed by advocacy and research groups, accounted for roughly four in ten formal remo...
is a fast-track administrative process that allows officers to order certain noncitizens removed without the full court procedures that characterize formal immigration (INA §240) proceedings, and it c...
The 2025 expansion of expedited removal broadened the pool of people who can be deported without an immigration court hearing, formally preserving the statutory right to a credible‑fear screening but ...
During removals reached record highs and enforcement was explicitly reoriented to prioritize recent border crossers and noncitizens with criminal histories rather than attempting to deport every unaut...
Available government-watchdog analyses and advocacy reporting show that a small but real number of citizens were deported in error in the years spanning 2002–2017, with investigators identifying at le...
sharply narrows procedural safeguards: people usually have no right to counsel, no hearing before an immigration judge, and no ordinary appeal to the , which means typical paths for review are curtail...
Expedited removal is a streamlined statutory process that lets DHS officers summarily order certain arriving or recently arrived noncitizens removed without a full hearing before an immigration judge,...
INA §238 authorizes expedited administrative removal for certain non‑permanent residents (notably aggravated felons), permitting the government to issue a final removal order without a traditional imm...
There is no authoritative figure in the provided reporting that states what percentage of deportations during President Trump’s first term received “due process” as a single, measurable statistic, and...
The credible‑fear screening was created as part of the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) to prevent summary deportation of asylum‑eligible people by inserting a...
Federal and administrative systems offer a narrow set of remedies for mistaken deportations and wrongful detentions—primarily expedited administrative reviews, limited immigration-court hearings in so...