Your fact-checks will appear here
The methods used by fact-checkers to evaluate claims and provide accurate information
are unevenly reliable: some raise legitimate awareness or reflect vetted medical choices, but many are anecdotes, paid endorsements, or simplifications that lack rigorous evidence and can mislead the ...
Fact‑checkers deploy a compact toolbox of verifiable evidence—documents, timestamps and metadata, contemporaneous media, primary sources, expert analysis, and platform provenance—to rebut after high‑p...
The claim that fact-checkers are “lame” is an understandable reaction to perceived disagreement and bias, but it is overstated: independent reviews show fact-checkers are useful tools with limits—disa...